Wednesday, January 30, 2008

and the good news keeps on coming:

another house republican retires: the 24th so far. the more that retire the more telling it is that everyone in washington knows that this is a democratic year and they are going to lose more and more seats in washington and around the country. woohoo!

that said, what an exciting Democratic year it is! while i'm sad about Edwards leaving the race because i really really liked him, i will say that it's all so positive in general with the outstanding national community coming out in droves to vote in the primaries. and amazing candidates running for president on down the ticket around the country. woohoo again!

Sunday, January 27, 2008

new column:

Where’s Waldo?

When those “Where’s Waldo?” books came out a while back and became some sort of weird pop phenomenon in the early 90’s, I hated them. I was never one to enjoy looking for needles in a haystack. More to the point, I’m not one to see details when looking at a larger picture.

While the usual saying goes that one is weakened by not being able to ‘see the forest for the trees.’ I have the opposite psychosis, I really have to be shown the point of seeing the trees for the forest. Hence, my frustration with simply even caring to find Waldo. Waldo was a inconsequential tree in the midst of the larger group of people who all made up the more-important forest.

For me, it has always been the larger picture. So, when over the years we have struggled within our Democratic party in primary elections, I found that I didn’t much care. The bigger and more important goal for me was winning the general election in November against the right-wing Republican establishment.

This was especially so in the 90’s and early 00’s when it seemed that the Republicans were winning election year after election year and any internal Democratic fighting seemed pointless and absurd. We needed to get over ourselves and stop the Republicans, I thought. As did many in our party. And we let a lot of our personal perspectives go to the wayside as we swallowed our pride, hid our feelings of disappointment, and fought for the larger goal of getting ‘any’ Democrat elected come November.

And then, sometime in the mid-00’s, many of us changed. I changed. I realized I was wrong.

It’s not letting go of our principles and cares of who will win our Democratic primary nominations that will win elections. In fact, it turned out we needed to find the strength to fight one another for who could carry the Democratic banner the strongest into November that mattered. Finding Waldo suddenly mattered.

Currently many of us are fighting over primaries. Is Obama, Clinton, Edwards, or someone else the best choice for our party? There is internal turmoil and frustration. Friends are fighting friends in the community over who is fully believed to be the best choice. Can’t we all just get along?

But I’ve realized that the point is that we shouldn’t all just get along to go along and crown one person just because we’re supposed to do so. This doesn’t mean that we can’t and shouldn’t get along for the larger good and come together in all other aspects, but it does mean that we should have the important political discussions that are needed to bring about the best outcome for us all as a community and a party.

I can imagine how just a few years ago we would have simply ‘crowned’ one person to lead the party. The primary would have been an easy coronation. And at the time we all believed that this was the best thing for the party because we didn’t have the time to fight amongst ourselves when the real goal was fighting Republicans. But we were wrong. Look at what has happened all across this nation as our internal struggles over who best to lead the party has brought out millions and millions of new voters interested in our party. Look at how polling places are overflowing and running out of ballots because people suddenly care to vote in the Democratic primary. Witness how young people are turning out in record numbers because they feel they actually have a real voice in picking the party’s nominee.

No, I was wrong when I didn’t care to look for Waldo. I was wrong to think that primaries didn’t matter. It’s the absolute opposite. Primaries, while difficult and complicated and frustrating among friends and colleagues, bring out the best for all of us in the party as a whole. The end result is that the winner of the primary will be all the more strong to carry on the banner to November. Whoever you are supporting in this presidential primary, and if you are working so extra hard for him or her, thank you. Thank you for taking the extra time to work for whom you believe to be the best and brightest and strongest for the leadership and future of the party. Your work is making the party stronger. And I know it isn’t easy. But it’s the best for us all.

Waldo is out there somewhere. I’m looking hard for him in the midst of the forest. Every tree matters now. The strength of the forest as a whole is in every tree. And I know that Waldo is thrilled that we’re all looking for him now. He’s been right there all along. And he’ll be with us when we all win in November.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

OMG OMG OMG OMG

Wow, this is very, very cool.

Missouri Republican Gov. Matt Blunt will not seek re-election this year — a shocking development in a state that is one of the nation’s most competitive political battlegrounds.

In a videotaped message posted to YouTube on Tuesday, Blunt said that “after a great deal of thought and prayer, and with the knowing that we’ve achieved virtually everything I set out to accomplish and more, I will not seek a second term in the upcoming election.”

In claiming accomplishments in achieving budget surpluses, tax cuts and increased education spending, Blunt said that he met nearly all of his goals in his first four-year term — and thus there is “not the same sense of mission for a second.” Blunt, 37, also expressed a desire to spend more time with his wife and their young son.

Though the governor cast his first three years in a positive light, Blunt has been hampered by mediocre approval ratings and had been polling poorly against Democratic state Attorney General Jay Nixon, who long prepared to challenge Blunt.

“My campaign for Governor has always been about moving Missouri forward,” Nixon said in a statement. “I will continue to focus on changing the direction of our state so that more Missourians have access to health care, more Missourians can find good-paying jobs and more Missouri children can get the quality education they deserve.”

Candidates who wish to run in the August 5 primary election must meet a March 25 deadline to submit qualifying paperwork with Missouri election officials. One potential Republican candidate is six-term Rep. Kenny Hulshof , who represents the state’s 9th District in northeastern Missouri. Hulshof seriously considered a run for governor in 2004 but declined to run.

Blunt’s father is House Minority Whip Roy Blunt , who represents Missouri’s southwestern 7th District and who said in a statement that he was proud of his son and that he respected his decision “to spend this year being the best governor he can be in service of our state and its people, rather than letting the focus shift to pure politics.”

Monday, January 21, 2008

Still a work in progress


Still a work in progress, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

But getting better
--Reese

Still a work in progress


Still a work in progress, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

But getting better
--Reese

Still a work in progress


Still a work in progress, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

But getting better
--Reese

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

very strange coincidences

recently i was thinking about how i had never seen the movie the client with one of my fav actresses susan sarandon. so i rented it and watched it over the weekend.

the kid who played the 'client' in the movie was decent and i wondered who he was and where he went to after the movie. so i looked him up and realized he was in a number of 90's movies and such and seemed to have an acting career, rather than a child actor who went nowhere. the movie itself sucked but i enjoy susan.

anyway, today, i'm reading the paper, and the headline jumps out at me: Actor Brad Renfro, 25, found dead at home. um, how random and strange and weird.

i just happened to see the movie after years of never seeing it and having no real reason to pick it up out of obscurity of movie rentals and decide to finally see it. on sunday. he died on tuesday.

life can be so interesting

IMG00665.JPG


IMG00665.JPG, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

--Reese

Monday, January 07, 2008

oh dear...

Walking baby


Walking baby, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

--Reese

Saturday, January 05, 2008

Downed


Downed, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

--Reese

Friday, January 04, 2008

why real life is just a continual simpsons episode

"[The waitress at the all-you-can-eat seafood buffet] says, 'Y'all fat, and y'all eat too much,'" Labit said.

Labit and Borrelli said they felt discriminated against because of their size.

"I was stunned, that somebody would say something like that. I ain't that fat, I only weigh 277," Borrelli said.

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

new column:

"Writers' Block:
Solidarity with My Writing Brothers and Sisters During the Strike"



















































writers' strike information

Tuesday, January 01, 2008

Home!


Home!, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

--Reese

Back home in sf


Back home in sf, originally uploaded by Reeses World.

--Reese